🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a law raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong research".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and fit for young users," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly happening at the regional level amid federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Apart from these regions, further nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

Even as this global conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.